“Okay,” says the influencer, “The story I’m about to tell you today is so unbelievable that it just has to be the truth…”
I click off. What? What are you talking about? Is this some weird tactic to drag people into believing you?
There’s odd logic in the post-science era. Sometimes it feels as though we’ve just gone back to a kind of medieval mysticism. How can it be more true if it’s less believable? I mean what does that even mean?
It all reminds me of that time I drove to Japan in an ice cream van. Yeah, and by the time I got to Kazakhstan I’d run out of Mr Whippy so I had to get a herdsman to show me how to milk a yak. Oh and in China, they have no idea what a Flake is so I got chased through the fields by children with a new taste for crumbly chocolate.
No? Too tall a tale? Good. Apparently that actually makes it truer.
No, the problem with this kind of thing is that it’s manipulating us into doubting our own ability to detect and believe the truth.
The need for evidence (which used to be quite the thing) is now replaced by the need to believe in something your ears have been itching for, that backs up what you’ve already half-suspected from your echo chamber.
Now I know what you’re thinking. It’s just repackaged faith, right? After all, religious belief requires the same evidence-free leap? An actual resurrection? Are you kidding? An invisible God? A man healing the sick, and walking on water? And a suffering world and a silent creator? Shouldn’t I be happy (as a follower of Jesus) that the world is returning to a kind of blind faith in the unbelievable?
Actually, no.
And the reason is that dissociating truth from belief actually removes us from any kind of belief at all.
Blind faith, I think, is probably no faith at all. Following online ‘priests’ who’ve taken it upon themselves to tell us what we can and can’t treat as truth is about as blind as it gets. No, faith requires you to have your eyes open, searching and longing for a glimpse of God.
This might surprise some of you, but I think it actually does require evidence. And part of the reason why I’m a Christian is that that evidence, the data points in my own life, have been my own encounters with Jesus himself. I can’t prove it to you with physical proofs any more than I can prove I dreamt about ice cream in central Asia, but I tell you what - I can prove it to myself. I know him.
Sorry if this is a bit preachy. I just don’t think I want to be in a world where truth is somehow ‘proven’ by our incredulity, where, in the vacuum that believable truth leaves when it’s tossed out of the window, anything goes - from outlandish conspiracy to silly nonsense, from political manipulation to outright deception. Perhaps it’s an old-fashioned view nowadays. Fair enough. All I’d say is, old-fashioned or not, Lord, help me keep my eyes open.